Loading…
Loading…
Written by Max Zeshut
Founder at Agentmelt · Last updated Sep 9, 2026
Modeling an agent workflow as a directed graph — nodes are steps (an LLM call, a tool call, a decision) and edges are the transitions between them — over an explicit shared state object that every node reads and writes. Execution is a walk through the graph with branches, loops, and conditional edges the developer specifies, rather than a sequence the model improvises. This is the model behind LangGraph and Google ADK's workflow agents, and it's what makes an agent's control flow deterministic, visualizable, and precisely interruptible — you can point at the exact edge where a Human-in-the-Loop (HITL) approval fires. The trade-off versus Role-Based Agents is up-front verbosity: you author the flow instead of describing agents and trusting a coordinator. Choose it when the workflow is complex, must be auditable, and 'the model decides the path' is a liability rather than a feature.
A regulated loan-processing agent is built as a graph: intake → verify documents → (conditional edge) if confidence < 0.9 route to a human-approval node, else route to auto-decision → notify. The shared state carries the applicant record through every node, Checkpointing (Agent State) persists it at each step, and an auditor can replay the exact path any given application took.
See it as a workflow
Automated Code Review WorkflowTrigger, steps, n8n nodes, guardrails and an importable template — plus what it costs to have it built.
Or skip the build
Workflows from $197/month, custom agents from $2,000.